November 07 2008 / by Will
Category: Education Year: 2008 Rating: 2
Cross posted from Where there’s a William by Will Brown.
I’m happy enough posting the following in my own name but am a bit uncomfortable extending my personal viewpoint to these pages. Since there are comparably ideologically driven postings from others on these pages, I once again probe the boundaries of the meme.
Remember all the Democratic concern over a resurgence of the draft? Looks like they knew what they were obsessing over:
“Obama will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year”.
(my bold)
Now, I readily grant that there is a substantive difference between involuntary active military service during time of war and 150 hours of involuntary “community service”. If it needs be said so bluntly, my derision is cast at the inducement to service, not the nature of the service performed.
On a not-entirely-unrelated note, I was once granted the opportunity to satisfy my misdemeanor debt to California society when I was – several – decades younger by performing “community service”. As a result, I have actual direct experience of all aspects of this issue upon which to base my commentary.
PARDON MY SCHADENFREUDE
Continue Reading
October 28 2008 / by Will
Category: Economics Year: General Rating: 1
Cross posted from Where there’s a William by Will Brown
What follows is excerpted from, and an expansion of, a comment I made regarding this Future Blogger post.
First, what it shouldn’t be. There are already an abundance of technology/science academies in existence; one more would simply be complicating an already over-engineered wheel. That said, Singularity University (SU) absolutely should arrange (ie: buy) access to those school’s technical curriculum via tele-presence if nothing else.
SU should primarily be modeled after the historical liberal arts education of the 19th century (particularly the English university model of Oxford, Cambridge and the like). The objective being to teach students how to think for themselves by providing them with the lessons learned by previous generations. There is an expression I use, “How can you decide what’s best to do next without knowing what has already been tried?” Practical knowledge of what has been tried, whether it succeeded or not and why provides one with a reference within which to frame a decision.
There is a long-running debate in the US (with variations in other countries as well) regarding the desirability of individual competence over governmental providence. It is rare for the argument to be expressed quite so blatantly, but this confrontation is always fundamental. In the context of today’s topic I will only say that the transition from a human-centric industrial society toward the promise inherent to the singularity concept is certain to be made more disruptive by an expanding dependant class of people then would be the case if the population trend was toward greater personal competence instead. I believe that preparing this potential market ought to be the initial focus point of any institution that seeks to advance society toward a seamless transition with singularity events.
Continue Reading
October 27 2008 / by Will
Category: Technology Year: 2008 Rating: 1
Cross posted from Where There’s A William (with edits) by Will Brown.
I would like a concensus, should I submit this to the X-Prize Foundation for official consideration?
The Singularity Summit was held this past weekend. X-Prize Foundation CEO Peter Diamandis confirmed that there is something in the works leading to what he termed a Singularity University, prompting Alvis Brigis to ask:
“Might this be a first step toward a Singularity X-Prize? :) What do you think a “Singularity University” might consist of?”
I address these questions directly in comments, but all of the foregoing inspires me to suggest a future X-Prize for the good doctor’s consideration: The Island Hop Challenge.
Here are the terms:
A $10 million prize to the first vehicle that can travel from Staten Island in New York to Coronado Island in California, within a six day period and using only the fuel carried by the vehicle at the start of the challenge (plug-in recharge of electric vehicles is forbidden, but an on-board mechanism to re-fill the internal fuel storage is permitted if such is powered from the vehicles on-board power system).
Continue Reading
October 18 2008 / by Will
Category: Education Year: 2008 Rating: 2
Fellow Future Bloggers may find this new Transhumanist E-zine of interest.
It’s in .pdf format, but the content is thought provoking and the price is certainly right. :)
October 17 2008 / by Will
Category: Relationships Year: General Rating: 5 Hot
All the news not-yet fit to use
PRESS ANNOUNCEMNET – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ScenarioLand Ventures, a subsidiary of FB/MEMEBOX Ent, are pleased to announce the formation of a joint undertaking with the WillWay Pty line of Virtual Agents. The WillWay Avatars (an early description of this concept was provided to FBNET readers by regular FB contributor Richard Pelletier) have all been certified as having passed the Turing Test, so humans in solitary circumstance will be able to arrange continuous company with electronic companions. These 
virtual agents are programmed to engage their host in intellectually stimulating fashion in the areas of interest determined by each customer.
Additionally, WillWay Avatars are programmed with a complex of precautionary response triggering thresholds that, when measured in toto, provide a reliable and secure monitor of the contracted individual’s immediate health or other condition (the pre-AI structure upon which this system is designed was first brought to FBNET users attention by FBNET Editor Alvis Brigis).
Continue Reading
October 16 2008 / by Will
Category: Economics Year: General Rating: 5 Hot
John Heylin’s recent post on economics inspired me to resurrect this post I wrote some 2 1/2 years ago. It’s a bit of a slog, but the boot’s firmly on the other foot now, John. :)
I was really tempted to make you all have to go to my page to follow the permalinks, which don’t survive cut-n-paste, but …
Finally, it’s an open question how much or whether I’m correct in any of this, but the concept isn’t a new one to me.
Cross posted from Where There’s A William by Will Brown
Blast From My Past
I wrote this as a guest post at Gary Gagliardi’s old website. I’m particularly proud of it and think it holds up well. I would be interested in other’s opinion on that or the subject matter itself. The original post, with it’s comment thread, can be accessed here.
—-
Strategy of the Singularity Model of Economics
April 30th, 2006 by Will Brown
UPDATE: Readers who find this of interest may also want to read the dialogue I engaged in with Micah Glasser in the comment section of this post.
As reported here, the death yesterday of former Harvard professor of economics and US Ambassador John Kenneth Galbraith prompts me to explore the concept of money and how that relates to strategy. I briefly wrote on this question here, making this observation:
For most of us I suspect, economics = money. While this is true as far as it goes, how often do any of us stop to think on what “money” really is? To the best of my understanding, money is the earliest known design of a universal accounting system and thus of a distributed network, as well. Economics would then be the means of measuring and manipulating the relative value of money over both distance and time.
While I feel quite confident that Mr. Galbraith (or Sam Dinkin, come to that) would be thoroughly unsatisfied with the brevity of my observation, I hope neither would outright reject the fundimental premise. Pending such a refutation (well, Sam’s anyway), I would like to examine possible strategies for making the transition from historical economic models to what I will call the Singularity Model of Economics.
Continue Reading
October 15 2008 / by Will
Category: Energy Year: 2008 Rating: 4 Hot
Cross posted from Where There’s A William by Will Brown
In an attempt to show I’m not entirely in the tank for any particular nuclear energy provider, I direct your attention to the following. Via Jerry Pournelle’s Current Mail link for Tuesday (10/14/08) comes notice of this NRC map of new nuclear power stations in the construction approval process.
I note that Texas has four such new plants already. Given the depressing quantities demanded on my electric utility bill this just-ended atypically cool summer, and in anticipation of the amounts no doubt to be claimed during the upcoming winter, I can only encourage more and faster, please.
October 12 2008 / by Will
Category: Energy Year: General Rating: 11 Hot
Cross posted from Where There’s A William.
As long as we seem to be in the mood to spend our way out of trouble anyway, what say we try to acquire a little something in return for or effort?
I have written about the Hyperion Power Module with some degree of specificity in the past, but the present socio-political climate within the US national environment allows me to complete the strategic formulation, I believe.
Since the recent signing into law of the US$850b financial legislation, the mechanism to create a unifying force to relieve the impending energy crisis the USA presently faces is now available. Since the SecTres works for the President, a simple executive order to assign 8.5 of those $850b to a specific project would provide ample force, I submit.
Beginning now, the President should direct formation of a contract with Hyperion to purchase 500 of it’s standard power modules on a crash construction basis to enhance the US domestic electric grid.
Here’s the Strategy: The USG offers to pay a one-time fee of US$1,000,000 per unit and to supply sufficient real estate from suitable USG controlled land, limited legislative exemption from construction legal challenge, engineering and regulatory assistance for site and plant design and the sum of US$200,000,000 for each of five purpose-built construction facilities. Additionally, USG agrees to purchase at 50% of the present advertised price of US$25,000,000 apiece, 500 units over the course of 5 years plus one year for construction of the assembly plants. Finally, USG agrees to finance from this allocation the recruitment, relocation, training and housing needs of sufficient workforce to initially staff all five anticipated production facilities.
Continue Reading
May 23 2008 / by Will
Category: Technology Year: General Rating: 6 Hot
Cross-posted from Where
There’s a William… 
Ok, I’ll bite.
Al Fin asks the tautological question; “Can the Singularity
save us from ourselves?” What follows is by way of my attempt
to answer as fully as I’m able, within the limits of my
understanding of the issues and concepts involved.
The abstract concept of a Technological Singularity (TS) was
made most famous in the recent past by inventor Ray Kurzweil. The
concept has several overlapping meanings, but I like George
Dvorsky’s definition best: The Singularity is a a blindspot in our
predictive thinking.
I personally define the Technological Singularity as: The
Singularity is that point in human technological development beyond
which we do not currently possess sufficient knowledge upon which
to base an extrapolative prediction. I certainly appreciate the
evocative imagery of Mr. Dvorsky’s proposition, not to mention it’s
economy, but I believe the concept of a singularity is too complex
to be adequately captured in such a brief phrase.
For one thing, a TS must be regarded as a moving target. As our
ability to understand the technological processes that could lead
to a singularity increase, the point in time regarded as being TS
onset must be pushed further off into the future. Remember, the TS
is that point in our technological development beyond which we can
no longer extrapolate a further possible advance (or even say with
any assurance what probable effect(s) might result). This doesn’t
mean we can’t guess, of course (engineers even have a technical
term for doing so; W(ild) A(ss) G(uess)), but that isn’t quite the
same thing. (cont.)
Continue Reading
